I’ve read about seven articles on this now and still don’t understand why they want this bill in the first place? The only reason seems to be to give the woman ‘more information’. As if women who have already made the decision to have an abortion will change their minds as soon as they hear a foetal heartbeat. Yeah, we really are that fickle. I’d definitely reverse an important decision like that after being penetrated against my wishes by my doctor and then made to listen to the heartbeat of a child I’ve decided I don’t want to give birth to.
Wonder how they’d react if someone introduced a bill to probe a man without his consent under the guise of information?